What Is Abstract Reasoning? Why This Ability Matters and Who Gets Tested

Memory NguwiBy Memory Nguwi
Last Updated 7/2/2026
Share this article
What Is Abstract Reasoning? Why This Ability Matters and Who Gets Tested
Advertisement

Abstract reasoning is the ability to spot patterns and work out rules in unfamiliar information, without relying on words, numbers, or what you already know. This article is about why that ability matters: what a strong score signals to an employer, where it helps most, and why it is used to assess people at every level.

You can find the precise definition, what a test looks like, worked examples, and how to prepare in the companion articles. Here the focus is different. If a test is ahead of you, it helps to understand why an employer cares about this ability in the first place, because that tells you what your score is really being used for. Whether you are applying for a first job on the front line or a seat in the executive suite, the same logic applies, and this article explains it.

What is abstract reasoning?

In plain terms, abstract reasoning is your ability to make sense of something you have never seen before. You are given unfamiliar material, usually patterns of shapes, and asked to find the rule that connects them. Because the material is new and carries no words or numbers, you cannot fall back on knowledge or vocabulary. You have to reason it out.

That is the whole of it for our purposes here. The point worth holding onto is that abstract reasoning is reasoning stripped of background knowledge. It is closer to raw problem solving than to anything you studied at school, which is exactly why employers find it so informative. The rest of this article is about that usefulness.

Why do employers test abstract reasoning?

Employers test abstract reasoning because it predicts how well you will perform and how quickly you will learn, across a wide range of jobs. It is one of the most informative single things they can measure before they know you.

The research on cognitive ability is steady on this point and is often misread. A review of the evidence on ability testing examined the beliefs people hold about these tests. It found three things. Scores reliably predict job and training performance. There is no level beyond which a higher score no longer adds information. And the tests are not the biased instruments they are often assumed to be. For an employer, a measure that forecasts performance across many roles, before any track record exists, is rare and valuable. That is why abstract reasoning earns its place in selection, and why your score is treated as a signal about future performance rather than a comment on your character.

Why does abstract reasoning matter more as work gets complex?

Abstract reasoning matters most where the work is complex, changeable, and short on clear rules. In simple, stable jobs, experience can carry you a long way. In complex ones, you constantly meet situations no one trained you for, and reasoning is what gets you through.

This is the heart of why general reasoning ability is valued. A well known analysis of why reasoning matters in everyday life argued that the advantage of strong reasoning grows with the complexity of the task. The reason is that complex work demands constant learning, judgment, and dealing with the unexpected. The more a role asks you to handle novelty, the more abstract reasoning predicts how well you will cope. This is also why the same ability is tested for a graduate trainee and for a senior leader. Both face the unfamiliar, just at different scales.

Does abstract reasoning matter at every level?

Yes. It is a common mistake to think these tests are only for graduate schemes or junior hires. The ability they measure is used throughout the organization, which is why people are tested across the full range of roles.

Consider what each level really demands. A frontline employee has to absorb new systems, procedures, and problems that the manual does not cover. A supervisor has to read situations with no precedent and decide quickly. A manager sets the approach that many unclear cases will follow. An executive reasons through strategic problems where there is no playbook. At each of these levels, the daily task is to make sense of the unfamiliar, which is precisely what abstract reasoning measures. So, if you are sitting one of these tests for a senior role, that is not unusual. It reflects that reasoning through novelty matters more, not less, as responsibility grows.

Is your abstract reasoning fixed, and is the test the final word?

No on both counts, and this is worth holding onto if a test result ever feels like a verdict. Your reasoning ability is not a fixed quantity stamped on you at birth, and a single score is never the whole story of who you are or what you can do.

A broad review of findings on intelligence makes the first point clearly. Reasoning ability is shaped substantially by environment and opportunity; scores have risen across whole populations over recent generations, and they respond to schooling and circumstance rather than being set in stone. The second point is simpler. A test measures one thing, on one day, under pressure. It says nothing about your character, your drive, or the experience you bring. A fair employer treats your score as one input among several, and you can hold it the same way. It is useful information about one ability, not a measure of your worth.

Key takeaways

1.  Abstract reasoning is the ability to find rules and patterns in unfamiliar material, without relying on words, numbers, or prior knowledge.

2.  Employers test it because it predicts job and training performance reliably across a wide range of roles, before any track record exists.

3.  Its value grows with the complexity of the work, because complex jobs constantly present situations no one trained you for.

4.  It is tested at every level, from frontline staff to executives, because reasoning through novelty matters more as responsibility grows.

5.  Reasoning ability is shaped by environment and opportunity. It is not fixed, and population scores have risen over generations.

6.  A single score measures one ability on one day. A fair employer treats it as one input among several, and so can you.

What this means for you

Walk into the test knowing what your score is for. It is an estimate of how well you reason through the unfamiliar, which an employer uses to predict how you will perform and learn. That is a fair thing to measure, and a useful one, but it is one signal, not a judgment on you.

Understanding this takes some of the heat out of the day. The test is not trying to catch you out or rank your worth. It usually sits inside a wider set of selection methods, and for a senior role it is one of several qualities an employer weighs. Prepare for it sensibly, then let it be one part of a fuller picture.

To see how an abstract reasoning test fits with the other assessments you may face, read our psychometric tests guide. It explains what each common assessment is for, so you can prepare for the whole process rather than one part of it.

Get HR insights in your inbox

Weekly HR strategy, leadership, and people-ops insights. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

Memory Nguwi

Memory Nguwi

Memory Nguwi is a Registered Occupational and Industrial Psychologist with more than twenty five years of practice. He holds a Master of Science in Occupational Psychology, a Post Graduate Diploma in Occupational Psychology, a Bachelor of Science Honours degree in Psychology, and a Diploma in Labour Relations. He is the Founder and Managing Consultant of Industrial Psychology Consultants. He has held this role since 2004. In that time he has led work on job evaluation, salary structuring, salary surveys, psychometric testing, employee engagement, performance management, workforce planning, productivity analysis, organizational design, board evaluations, and executive recruitment. His clients work in banking, telecommunications, mining, manufacturing, retail, fast moving consumer goods, health services, government, revenue administration, and international development. He has served on eleven boards. These include a national revenue authority, a listed beverages company, a national health services body, listed financial institutions, a national productivity institute, an international scientific research academy, and the national professional association of psychologists, which he led as President. He has chaired human resources committees and finance, risk, audit, and compliance committees at the board level. He has spoken at more than forty conferences across three continents. He organized leadership and human resources events that brought the late Doctor Stephen Covey, Dave Ulrich, Doctor John Maxwell, Brian Tracy, and John Parsons to audiences of 200 to more than 1 500 participants. He has published more than six hundred articles on human resources, leadership, productivity, and occupational psychology. He is a joint author on peer reviewed research published in the Journal of Interdisciplinary Academic Research.