Raconteur had an article this week on toxic workplace cultures. This coincided with some discussions I’ve been having with people who are suffering demoralization and high stress as they experience what they describe as a ‘toxic workplace culture’.
I’ve been thinking about their stories – which are sad and alarming. One of them said, ‘I cry every morning at the thought of having to go to work’, another ‘I put on my mask of competence, grit my teeth, and know that I have to get through the day, I don’t know how long I can keep doing this. Another, ‘there are so many red flags raised about the toxic culture, but nothing changes. I think the leaders just don’t want to know.
What I’m understanding from their stories is that, in their organizations, the rhetoric around employee wellbeing and employee engagement is laughable. Those I’m talking with tells of high turnover, clique-ish/cartel behaviour, withholding of information, and feelings of alienation, isolation, and exclusion. There is no sense or evidence that employees have positive autonomy, mastery, or purpose. (See the RSA Animate, Drive, on this).
As I was listening, I started to wonder what triggers a toxic workplace culture. A literal toxic landscape is a useful analogy. Typically they are the outcome of things including poor systems and controls (safety, risk, accounting, etc), combined with leadership values and attitudes, and often employee collusion. They can appear over time as seepage into the environment or they can appear as an event that is the outcome of a toxic culture.
The Deepwater Horizon oil spill is a well-known event example, while the films Silkwood, Erin Brockovich, and Dark Waters are some that explore long-term seepage that generates literal toxic landscapes. (One that I heard about over the weekend was the coal ash contamination in North Carolina).
Investigations usually find that the contamination and/or the real risk of causing contamination was known but covered up or ignored until it became impossible to do so.
Taking this analogy into organizational life, you can see similar roots of a toxic cultural landscape that will result in either a specific event or that will continue as ongoing seepage until it becomes impossible to cover up or ignore.
The story of Travis Kalanick, ex-CEO Uber illustrates. In him, you can see someone who seems to have deliberately endorsed (or even role modeled) the attributes that lead to a toxic culture.
The Raconteur article quotes, Clive Lewis, author of Toxic: A Guide to Rebuilding Respect and Tolerance in a Hostile Workplace as saying, “A toxic organization exhibits low levels of trust, has misaligned systems and incapable line managers who work hard to preserve their status at all costs.”
This quote intrigued me, because what I’d heard from the people I’ve been talking with are the low levels of trust, and the incapable line managers, none had mentioned misaligned systems.
In pursuit of more on the misaligned systems (I am an organizational designer!) I listened to an interview with Clive Lewis. He talks about ‘the toxic triad’, which interacts and is in play all the time.
The triad comprises:
- The individual employees’ behaviours and interactions. Toxic employees are prone to sow discord and division. They can be “characteristically uncivil and are likely to pursue retribution rather than offer forgiveness”
- The line manager. Toxic workplaces often have line managers who lack the competence required for their role and are often characterized by a “demonstrable lack of regard and compassion for the wellbeing of team members”.
- The organizational systems. On the systems he noted (expanded in the book) that toxic workplaces tended to:
value process (ticking boxes, sticking to the procedures), over interests – being pragmatic, applying common-sense
focus on hierarchies and organization charts i.e. a command and control approach over enabling employee autonomy
have unclear role boundaries with overlapping remits rather than clear accountabilities
He also noted that from his experience public sector organizations is less likely to have the systems and resources to be able to deal with a toxic workplace. This is because the systems are more bureaucratic and have more red-tape to cut through than private sector organizations, and resources like money for coaching, mediation, pay-offs, building a well-being culture (see Betterspace on this last), etc, are lacking.
One of the questions about toxic workplace culture is can it be cleaned up? Possibly, and only if there is a real intention of doing so by all stakeholders, backed up by obvious and effective action on multiple fronts.
More than 10 years after the Deepwater Horizon oil spill, we are still seeing the impacts of it, albeit some progress on clean-up and future prevention of similar events has been made/ For example there has been: international collaboration on effective oil-spill and other clean-ups, experimentation on what clean-up methods, continuous monitoring of the landscape changes as clean-up progresses, a lengthy investigation into how it occurred in the first place – which cited unclear accountabilities and cost-cutting as two contributory factors, and significant changes to the regulatory environment.
Looking at the ways literal toxic landscapes are cleaned up could provide insights, adaptations, and applications into a toxic organizational workplace in order to support its clean-up.
Whether the new CEO of Uber, Dara Khosrowshahi will be able to really clean up Uber, or whether toxicity will still lurk remains to be seen. There are many micro-cultures in big organizations. However, he says, in an interview, that his mission when he joined was to root out unethical behavior and promote truth and transparency, and he has established some systems and processes to do this. He also talks about the necessity to design a governance process that unifies the executive team to coordinate global operations.
An HBR article, Time’s up for toxic workplaces’ suggests three actions, to help clean up a toxic workplace culture:
- Companies should increase awareness and educate managers about all costs associated with abusive conduct.
- Companies can incorporate or strengthen anonymous feedback channels where employees can voice their concerns and report abusive experiences without fear of retribution.
- Organizations need to uphold and enforce fair and ethical norms in all aspects of company life
These seem ok (self-evident?) but not sufficient pointers. Designing systems and processes that act to lessen the risk of toxicity occurring and will spotlight the first signs of it (to enable immediate remedial action) might make a toxic workplace less likely to develop in the first place.
In both the literal toxic landscapes and the organizational ones, it seems that constant vigilance must be maintained to guard against the risk of toxicity re-emerging from the same source or from a similar but different source. Well-designed systems and processes will help with this.
How would you clean up a toxic workplace culture? Let me know.
SIDEBAR: I’ve noticed that in toxic workplaces individuals can sometimes spiral into ‘sink holes’, that can make things worse. See the tool Avoiding the sinkholes for more on this. Also, Amy Edmundson’s work on psychological safety is relevant.
The post "Toxic workplace cultures" was first published by Dr. Naomi Stanford here https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/toxic-workplace-cultures-naomi-stanford/
About Dr Naomi Stanford
Dr Naomi Stanford is an organization design practitioner and author. During her earlier UK career, Dr Stanford was an employee of large multinational companies, including Price Waterhouse, British Airways, Marks & Spencer, and Xerox. She moved to the US mid-career working as an organization design consultant to a range of organizations in the government, non-profit and private sectors. She then returned to the UK to work in the government sector. Naomi is now free-lancing as an organization design consultant/adviser. Additionally, she writes books, articles, and a weekly blog (over 800 so far). Naomi speaks at conferences and tweets regularly on organization design. Currently, she is writing the third edition of her Economist book ‘A Guide to Organisation Design’, to be published in March 2022.
View Naomi Stanford's full profile